REAL MONEY GAMING
Compliance Improves Post
SKOCH Responsible Gaming Surveys

India’s online gaming industry is beginning to evolve-slowly but discernibly-from a largely unregulated, reputation-sensitive sector into one that is showing early signs of maturity and accountability. The SKOCH Responsible Gaming Survey, conducted in June 2025 (covering 53 Gaming apps), builds on the baseline established in September 2024 and presents a picture that, while still uneven, reveals real momentum on several fronts.

20 June, 2025 Law News, News
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

40% Apps Improve Compliance Rank, 55% Improve Score, 4% Get > 50%

India’s online gaming industry is beginning to evolve-slowly but discernibly-from a largely unregulated, reputation-sensitive sector into one that is showing early signs of maturity and accountability. The SKOCH Responsible Gaming Survey, conducted in June 2025 (covering 53 Gaming apps), builds on the baseline established in September 2024 and presents a picture that, while still uneven, reveals real momentum on several fronts.

The biggest shift is not in regulation but in industry behaviour. Compliance, once considered peripheral, is now climbing up the priority ladder for a growing number of gaming platforms. This is being driven not by fear of enforcement but by a clearer understanding of what it means to build long-term trust with users and investors.

Framework Sets Stage

At the heart of this transformation lies the SKOCH Responsible Digital Gaming Framework, launched in July 2024 at the 98th SKOCH Summit. Developed through six months of structured dialogue with legal experts, economists, mental health professionals, regulators and gaming executives, the framework introduced a 74-indicator structure to assess both technical compliance (presence of policy) and quality of compliance (effectiveness in execution).
The framework is sector-agnostic, covering a broad array of practices: player protection, grievance redressal, ethical marketing, risk mitigation, safer gameplay, financial checks, social messaging and mental health support. It is comprehensive but flexible—designed to evolve with the industry’s needs.

What is Improving?

One of the most encouraging takeaways from the June 2025 survey is the improvement in the quality of compliance, which rose from 27% in September 2024 to 29% in June 2025. While the industry’s overall technical compliance remained flat (34%, down marginally from 35%), it is the depth of implementation—real- world responsiveness and effectiveness—that has shown upward movement.

This improvement was visible across multiple indicators:

  • Voluntary Self- Exclusion features became more accessible and visible.
  • Grievance Redressal saw better integration and faster resolution times.
  • Safer Real Money Gaming Interactions increased in frequency and clarity.

These are not cosmetic changes—they reflect deeper back-end investment in responsible operations.

Who is Improving?

This year’s survey confirms that compliance performance is spreading across the board, not just concentrated in a handful of players:

  • 40% of gaming apps improved their compliance rank.
  • 55% showed improved compliance scores.
  • The proportion of apps scoring over 50% quadrupled, from 1% to 4% in less than a year.


These are notable figures, considering the voluntary nature of the SKOCH framework. There are no regulatory penalties, no statutory filings—only public benchmarking. Yet, peer pressure, stakeholder
expectations and the reputational rewards of being seen as responsible are now proving to be strong motivators.

Focus Areas

Some of the most visible gains have come in historically weak areas:

Mental Health, which averaged just 1% in September 2024, rose to 7% in June 2025. The increase was driven by improvements in counselling services, awareness campaigns, and internal policy documentation.

Know Your Limits, which helps players set personal boundaries on time and money, saw technical adoption rise from 11% to 35%.

Public Awareness and Education indicators nearly quintupled—evidence that platforms are beginning to take user education seriously.

Other noteworthy improvements include higher scores in Professionalism (up from 35% to 40%) and Social Responsibility (from 23% to 28%), suggesting a more holistic approach to compliance beyond mere
legal survival.


Long Road Ahead

SKOCH surveys shows despite these gains, the journey is far from complete. Some parameters remain stubbornly under-addressed. Credit restriction, financial vulnerability checks and suicide prevention protocols continue to score in the single digits. Most apps still lack meaningful engagement with mental health professionals and multi-language accessibility remains a low priority despite India’s linguistic diversity.

In short, there is momentum—but also a clear need for acceleration. The industry is moving beyond the “checklist” approach to compliance, but much of that movement is still in its early stages.


Towards Responsible Gaming Culture


The June 2025 findings makes clear that the industry is capable of change when given the right tools, metrics and benchmarks. The SKOCH Responsible Gaming Framework has proven that a voluntary, well-structured model can drive genuine introspection and improvement—even without regulatory compulsion.

In an environment of rising user expectations and growing scrutiny, companies that embed compliance as a core value—rather than a crisis response—will be the ones best positioned to thrive. The question is no longer whether responsible gaming matters. The question is who leads in making it the norm.

Comparative Table

REPORTING INDICATORS  Jun 2025 Sep 2024
Technical % Extent % Average % Technical % Extent % Average %
1. Responsibility 49 35 42 50 26 38
1.1 Player Protection 51 36 44 43 22 33
  1.1.1 Underage RMG 89 60 74 81 42 62
  1.1.2 Restriciting Access 73 51 62 83 42 63
  1.1.3 Know Your Limits 35 27 31 11 5 8
  1.1.4 Voluntary Self-Exclusion 53 41 47 40 22 31
  1.1.5 Credit Restriction 11 8 10 4 17 10
  1.1.6 Responsible Marketing 46 30 38 42 21 31
1.2 Safer Gaming 48 32 40 37 20 28
  1.2.1 Company Verification 58 41 49 68 38 53
  1.2.2 Deposit Limit 52 38 45 28 15 22
  1.2.3 Company License 41 31 36 30 15 23
  1.2.4 Ethical Conduct 51 54 52 66 34 50
  1.2.5 Industry Ombudsman 20 15 18 11 6 9
  1.2.6 Age Restriction 64 56 60 79 42 61
  1.2.7 Market Control 8 6 7 0 0 0
  1.2.8 Stake Limits 24 17 20 13 6 10
1.3 Financial Safety 42 31 36 36 19 27
  1.3.1 Anti-money Laundering 43 32 37 23 12 17
  1.3.2 Statutory RMG Levy 79 61 70 89 48 68
  1.3.3 Online Slots Stake Limits 10 8 9 4 2 3
  1.3.4 Fin Vulnerability Checks 21 14 17 0 0 0
  1.3.5 Grievance Redressal 84 60 72 100 52 76
  1.3.6 Black Market Control 14 10 12 0 0 0
1.4 Fair and Transparency 53 39 46 94 47 71
1.5 Regulatory Compliance 58 43 51 85 43 64
1.6 Public Awareness and Edu 44 29 37 11 5 8
2. Integrity Gaming 44 31 37 46 24 35
2.1 Financial Integrity 38 28 33 45 23 34
  2.1.1 Licence Check 39 30 34 28 14 21
  2.1.2 Bonus Restrictions 45 31 38 58 31 45
  2.1.3 Business Details 29 22 26 49 24 37
2.2 Anti-Corruption Measures 24 16 20 23 11 17
2.3 Fair and Transparency 62 46 54 90 49 70
2.4 Data Security 31 22 27 40 25 32
2.5 Ethical Conduct 51 38 45 57 28 42
2.6 Compliance Monitoring 62 44 53 57 28 42
2.7 Education and Awareness 39 26 33 11 5 8
3. Risk Management 40 27 34 53 29 41
3.1 Regulatory oversight 15 10 13 14 9 12
3.2 Vetting industry employees 8 6 7 6 4 5
3.3 Regulatory Obligation 58 34 46 68 33 51
3.4 Learning and Guidelines 75 55 65 77 42 60
3.5 Mitigation Measures 40 28 34 35 20 28
4. Professionalism 46 33 40 46 23 35
4.1 Customer Service 76 54 65 98 49 74
4.2 Industry Knowledge 23 16 19 13 7 10
4.3 Risk Management 31 21 26 40 18 29
4.4 Financial Integrity 84 64 74 57 28 43
4.5 Conflict Resolution 62 41 51 94 45 70
4.6 Professional Development 18 12 15 11 5 8
4.7 Corp Social Responsibility 32 22 27 15 6 11
5. Marketing & Advertisement 39 27 33 41 21 31
5.1 Risk Warning 25 17 21 8 4 6
5.2 Prohibition of Misleading Ads 6 3 5 30 15 23
5.3 Protection of Minors 82 59 71 85 45 65
6. Social Responsibility 31 24 28 31 15 23
6.1 Social Messaging 23 16 19 22 12 17
  6.1.1 Dynamic Messaging 18 12 15 6 3 4
  6.1.2 Informative Messaging 45 33 39 57 29 43
  6.1.3 Self-Appraising Messaging 19 13 16 4 2 3
  6.1.4 Monetary & Time-Based Pop-up 10 7 8 23 12 17
6.2 Crime Prevention 35 32 33 29 15 22
  6.2.1 Cyber Crime Prevention 48 37 42 58 29 44
  6.2.2 Financial Loss Prevention 28 19 23 0 0 0
6.3 Fairness and Transparency 29 39 34 0 0 0
6.4 Protection of Vulnerable 18 12 15 2 1 2
6.5 Online Protections 53 38 45 68 34 51
6.6 Human Rights 29 21 25 32 14 23
  6.6.1 Harm Awareness 10 7 8 2 1 1
  6.6.2 Safer RMG Interactions 35 26 30 49 23 36
  6.6.3 Suicide Prevention 5 4 5 0 0 0
  6.6.4 Customer Interaction 68 48 58 75 34 55
7. Mental Health 8 5 7 1 0 1
7.1 Mental Health Policies 7 4 6 0 0 0
7.2 Employee Assistance Programs 1 1 1 0 0 0
7.3 Mental Health Awareness 8 5 7 0 0 0
7.4 Digital Literacy 13 9 11 0 0 0
7.5 Counselling Services 20 13 17 6 26 16
7.6 Work Environment 2 1 1 0 0 0
7.7 Monitoring and Adjustment 8 4 6 0 0 0
8. Multi-Language 16 11 14 15 8 12
8.1 User Accessibility 36 24 30 25 12 18
8.2 Cultural Sensitivity 4 3 4 0 0 0
8.3 Business Opportunities 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.4 Cross-Language Info Retrieval 14 10 12 23 12 17
8.5 Customer Support 22 16 19 57 27 42
8.6 Content Localisation 15 10 13 4 2 3
8.7 Sentiment Analysis 16 11 13 0 0 0
Industry Average 34 24 29 35 19 27

Disclaimer:

  • The views expressed in this feature and accompanying box story are based on SKOCH Group’s independent research, surveys, and analysis. Compliance scores reflect voluntary adoption of best
    practices by companies and are not indicative of statutory compliance or regulatory approvals. Technical compliance is assessed based on features visible or disclosed on publicly available platforms, while quality of compliance reflects the subjective assessment of SKOCH researchers with academic backgrounds in law, economics, and public policy.
  • Legal references to High Court judgments are derived from publicly accessible orders and are cited here for informational and analytical purposes. These do not constitute legal advice, nor should they be construed as final interpretations of the law. Readers are encouraged to read the full text of court decisions and seek independent legal counsel for specific applications.
  • All company names, app titles and trademarks mentioned are the properties of their respective owners and are used solely for illustrative and reporting purposes.

Download Full Report

Recommended Articles

cover

India-UK agree to exchange experiences and best practices in areas of working of commercial courts, and ADR mechanisms like arbitration and mediation

Subject of framing regulations for entry of UK Law Firms and Lawyers deliberated in Legal Services Committee (LSC) meeting

Leave a Reply